If you are in cryptocurrency and want to service the US market then a registration with FinCEN as a Money Service Business (MSB) is usually a pre-requisite.
By registering at a Federal level, your next question should be whether you are required to register at a State level too as an MSB. You need to do your homework before you register with FinCEN as you have to indicate the states where you will operate in the FinCEN registration form.
Below we have collected the position of states on cryptocurrency and whether they will require state-level MSB licensing. This information is simply provided to facilitate your research into this area and we disclaim any liability for any inaccuracies.
In a state where there are no MSB laws then naturally you would be inclined to operate there, but there are only a few.
Also, you may be inclined to operate in certain states where there has been no specific guidance on Virtual Currency but it would be completely reckless to do so. You should check with the State regulator first before jumping in.
A handful of the 50 states have provided some clear guidance on which cryptocurrency business models they will license. In very general terms, the approach seems to be to include decentralised cryptocurrency within the definition of ‘monetary value’. The implications of which is that the standard MSB regulated activity of ‘money transmission’ can be done now using cryptocurrency.
NONE OF THE BELOW SHOULD BE RELIED UPON AS LEGAL ADVICE.
VC Licensing States
Virtual currency licensing requirement
Covers the transmission of monetary value in the form of virtual currency.
“requires an applicant for a money transmitter license to indicate whether the business will transmit virtual currency (such as Bitcoin), allows the commissioner to deny such a license if the proposed business model poses an undue risk of financial loss to consumers, and allows him to place additional requirements on such a license including requiring different surety bond amounts than for other money transmitters”
Passed House and Senate, Signed into Law
PA 15-53—sHB 6800
Legislation to empower regulator to create rules for all virtual currency businesses. No further guidance provided as yet.
Status: Introduced in House
Kansas provided a Guidance Note on the interpretation of the Kansas Money Transmission Act (KMTA) to cryptocurrency businesses. Essentially, the exchange of VC to fiat by an exchange would constitute money transmission.
“Exchange of cryptocurrency for sovereign currency through a third party exchanger is generally considered money transmission. For example, most Bitcoin exchange sites facilitate exchanges by acting as an escrow-like intermediary. In a typical transaction, the buyer of cryptocurrency sends sovereign currency to the exchanger who holds the funds until it determines that the terms of the sale have been satisfied before remitting the funds to the seller. Irrespective of its handling of the cryptocurrency, the exchanger conducts money transmission by receiving the buyer’s sovereign currency in exchange for a promise to make it available to the seller.”
No reference to exchange of VC for other VCs. Advisable to seek further guidance from OSBC. Note MSB licensing requirement in Kansas does not define VC as a Permissible Instrument so, most likely, exchange will need to have a reserve of USD dollars to cover outstanding liabilities in VC. In addition, there is a requirement for a regular software audits.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Division of Banks
Division of Banks
1000 Washington Street, 10th Floor
Boston, MA 02118-6400
Division of Banks
Conducted a VC survey in 2014
Currently brokerage of VC is not subject to foreign transmittal license. Potentially P2P VC exchange may be subject to licensing.
“Massachusetts General Laws chapter 169 requires that all persons who engage or are financially interested in the business of receiving deposits of money for the purpose of transmitting the same or equivalents thereof to foreign countries obtain a foreign transmittal agency license from the Division. In a bitcoin transaction, the kiosk either receives funds or receives bitcoins. The purpose is not for transmission to a foreign country but rather the purchase of bitcoins from Coindeavors by the user. Coindeavors will be selling its own bitcoins to the user-buyer at the kiosk. The company is physically located in Massachusetts as will be its kiosks. All bitcoin transactions with users will take place entirely in Massachusetts. Based on the facts presented, Coindeavors is not required to be licensed as a foreign transmittal agency by the Division.”
Captures custodians of VC that hold assets for more than 30 days (see page 29)
Money Transmission licensing regime includes VC exchanges.
North Carolina licenses VC exchanges as Money Transmitters.
Guidance provided on an website FAQ by North Carolina Commissioner of Banks:
The NC MTA requires all persons engaged in the business of money transmission to obtain a license. Because the NC MTA defines “money transmission” as the “act of engaging in the business of receiving money or monetary value for transmission within the United States or to locations abroad by any and all means, including payment instrument, wire, facsimile, or electronic transfer,” and further defines “monetary value” as a “medium of exchange, whether or not redeemable in money,” virtual currency is within the scope of the NC MTA. See N.C. Gen. Stat. 53-208.3(a), 53-208.2(a)(11)(b), and 53-208.2(a)(12) (2015).
A virtual currency exchanger is a person that exchanges virtual currency for fiat currency or other virtual currencies, and vice versa. An exchanger that sells its own stock of virtual currency is generally not considered a virtual currency transmitter under the NC MTA. In contrast, an exchanger that holds customer funds while arranging a satisfactory buy/sell order with a third party, and transmits virtual currency and fiat currency between buyer and seller, will typically be considered a virtual currency transmitter.
In June 2016, NCCOB provided further guidance on exemptions that would apply. Miners are now explicitly excluded, software and multi-signature wallets excluded and ‘blockchain 2.0’ projects. More details on implications here.
Nevada Financial Institutions Division
Investor warning notice:
Licensing of VC exchanges and other models.
Washington State Department of Financial Institutions
VC Exchanges subject to MSB licensing
“In Washington, digital currency is included in the definition of “Money Transmission” in the Uniform Money Services Act (UMSA)”
Uniform Money Services Act
Wyoming Division of Banking
State licenses VC providers and or exchanges.
Virtual currency defined as permissive instrument. Exchanges likely to require MSB licensing.
Texas Department of Banking
Guidance interprets Texas Money Services Act and captures VC exchanges
Exchange of cryptocurrency for sovereign currency through a third party exchanger is
generally money transmission.
Guidance provided by Department of Financial Institutions and captures VC exchanges.
“Exchange of cryptocurrency for sovereign currency through a third party exchanger is generally money transmission. For example, most Bitcoin exchange sites facilitate exchanges by acting as an escrow-like intermediary […] Exchange of one cryptocurrency for another cryptocurrency is not money transmission. Regardless of how many parties are involved, there is no receipt of money, and therefore no money transmission occurs.”
VC added to definition of money
Most likely to include VC exchanges.
Money “means currency or legal tender or any other product that is generally recognized as a medium of exchange and shall include any form of virtual currency”
Section 2. License Required.–(a) No person shall engage in
the business of transmitting money by means of a transmittal
instrument for a fee or other consideration with or on behalf of
an individual without first having obtained a license from the
[Department of Banking nor shall any person engage in such
business as an agent except as an agent of a person licensed or
exempted under this act.] department.